Hi! I'm HydroLance and I'm trying to become more involved in Wikipedia! I made this account only recently, but I've been on this site as a reader for as long as I can remember. I've always loved the Free Encyclopedia's scope and purpose, and while I've mostly made minor, gnomish edits, I plan to contribute in other ways once I'm more experienced.
Those who understand binary, but not ternary
Those who understand ternary, but not binary
Those who understand both
And those who doesn’t understand either.
Although this user acknowledges the logical fallacy ad populum, they do not think that it applies to human language, and recognise that the majority determines grammatical "right" and "wrong".
couldn't've
This user believes that couldn't've would make a perfectly fine word.
Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.
This user knows that "there's" with a plural subject is a pervasive grammatical error. There'sThere are too many people making this mistake. Don't be one of them.
I live in Wisconsin (in the United States), my interests include history, science, and language, and I often come to Wikipedia to get lost in a rabbit hole, improving things along the way.