Talk:Aikido/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Korppi76 08:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)==Styles== The last three styles in the list - those of Rod Kobayashi, Seagal and Nocquet - are they not a part of Aikikai? If they are, they should not be listed separately. If they are not, now big are they? Should we list all independent aikido organisations there is? I fear the list could be long... Habj 10:19, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I removed Aiki-Budo. As far as I could see it referred to a stage in Uesthibas development, an aikido of longer time ago still visible through some of the teachers within and outside of the Aikikai; if we list every technically different aikido as a style IMO we will have as meny styles as teachers. Habj 19:55, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I changed Tendokan Aikido to Tendoryu Aikido, because Tendokan means the Dojo from Shimizu Sensei in Tokyo. -- ukemi 13:54, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I altered the Tomiki Aikido entry slightly since I felt it was redundant with the Shodokan Aikido entry below. There are some groups which consider themselves Tomiki but not Shodokan but Shodokan is what Tomiki called his style. It's a bit confusing but this way I think it is less so than two entries. Peter Rehse
I don't see it has a huge problem right now but perhaps the style section will need to be re-worked. For example not all of the styles listed (and I see the number growing) have a Honbu Dojo in Japan (as stated in the first line of the section). With the growing number (often for political reasons - as I guess was usually the case in the past also) of new independent dojos which ones are actually styles and more to the point how many affiliated dojos do you need to be considered major. Also - several of the styles are affiliated to one of the major styles. Major appears to mean one of your members thinks your style is major and had it tacked on to the original list which made more sense. I don't want to start messing around with anything right now but how about styles founded by pre-war students of Ueshiba, founded by post-war students of Ueshiba, Independent dojos. There should still be room for unique subsets of the major styles or dojos that broke away from these. For discussion purposes only - any opinions. Peter Rehse 08:10, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
OK I guess it bothered me more than I thought. I did some re-arranging. My biggest worry is about the Iwamma group and I hope I did them justice. The last entry ... well to be blunt one dojo does not make a style and I think it should be removed. It's dojo advertising and there are hundreds of larger independent associations. Tenshin is also Aikikai affiliated as far as I know but this bothers me less. I removed Tomiki as a separate entity - no need for that as it is correctly described under Shodokan.Peter Rehse 06:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
I think the latest Style entry should be removed as they are part of the Aikikai. I placed an entry in User talk:Ctozer to leave it with the author for a few days after which I will remove it. Hopefully he will see the light. He also wrote an article about himself to which myself and one other commented. I suspect it is just a matter of understanding how Wikipedia works.Peter Rehse 05:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm thinking about removing the name and links to the USAF and ASU from the Aikikai entry and referring to the List of Famous Aikidoka where I will include the links with the appropriate name (Chiba with USAF and Satome with ASU). The reason is mainly to head off the inclusion of a number of other organization links which would tend to swamp the Aikikai entry. Comments?Peter Rehse 04:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Edwin Stearns | Talk 14:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Could someone whip up at least a stub for Noriaki Inoue and/or Shin'ei Taido. Trying to get rid of empty links but I think they are important enough to the overall history of Aikido that they should not be deleted. A stub for Nihon Goshin Aikido would also be great - I think there was one but it was deleted because of copyright violation.Peter Rehse 04:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)