California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz
1974 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz, 416 U.S. 21 (1974), was a US Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Bank Secrecy Act, passed by Congress in 1970 requiring banks to record all transactions and report certain domestic and foreign transactions of high dollar amounts to the United States Treasury, did not violate the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution.[1]
Quick Facts California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz, Argued January 16, 1974 Decided April 1, 1974 ...
California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz | |
---|---|
Argued January 16, 1974 Decided April 1, 1974 | |
Full case name | California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz |
Citations | 416 U.S. 21 (more) 94 S. Ct. 1494; 39 L. Ed. 2d 812 |
Case history | |
Prior | Stark v. Connally, 347 F. Supp. 1242 (N.D. Cal. 1972); probable jurisdiction noted, 414 U.S. 816 (1973). |
Holding | |
The record-keeping and reporting requirements of Bank Secrecy Act do not violate the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell |
Concurrence | Powell, joined by Blackmun |
Dissent | Douglas, joined by Brennan (parts I and II-A only) |
Dissent | Brennan |
Dissent | Marshall |
Laws applied | |
Bank Secrecy Act |
Close