United States v. Stewart (2003)
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about United States v. Stewart (2003)?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
For other uses, see United States v. Stewart.
United States v. Stewart, 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003) and 451 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2006), is a Ninth Circuit case involving a challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o)[2] under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found against the defendant, ruling that possession of homemade machine guns can be constitutionally regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause.
Quick Facts United States v. Stewart, Court ...
United States v. Stewart | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | United States of America v. Robert Wilson Stewart, Jr.. |
Argued | August 5, 2003 |
Decided | November 13, 2003 |
Citation(s) | 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003); 451 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2006) |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Alex Kozinski, Thomas G. Nelson, Jane A. Restani[1] |
Close